This is assignment that requires students to
1) demonstrate their understanding of the frameworks for comparative media analysis, and
2) critically evaluate one of those frameworks using a specific case study.
Part 1 is intended to scaffold the formative learning and assessment process by first asking students to focus on media theory/critical thinking, and demonstrate their understanding of the strategies, before selecting and critically applying one strategy to a case study of media practice. The two parts should work together, with a clear, cogent, coherent and consistent integration of their argument. They should be submitted as one document.
Part 1) Strategy Rationale, 800 – 1000 words
‘What is the purpose of Southernizing and/or de-Westernization comparative media research?’
In answering this question, you are being asked to show evidence of your reading and engagement with literature; demonstrate your understanding of critical media frameworks for comparative media analysis; and identify similarities and differences.
Task summary
To develop understanding of frameworks for comparative media analysis and be able to explain their similarities and differences.
To scaffold the formative learning and assessment process by first focusing on media theory /critical thinking.
To show evidence of reading and engaging with critical media frameworks
Must include discussion of research strategies to achieve this goal.
Did you know that effective analysis of concepts requires professionalism in handling academic research Papers? Do no compromise on your grade choose professional Research writers at elitetutorslab.com