The theoretical and changing HRMlandscape

Explanation of submission requirements and further guidance

• Assessmentsare subject to a word limit to ensure consistency of approach across all modules. Your work should not exceed the limit indicated (excluding references and appendices). Do not feel that you have to “achieve” this (max) word count in your work. What is important is that the work satisfies the stated learning outcomes which are articulated through the assessment criteria (see following page).
• Care is taken to ensure that work has been marked correctly. Checks are conducted by both a second lecturer and an independent expert from outside the University on batches of work.
• Your work will not be returned to you but you will receive detailed feedback explaining how your mark has been arrived at and how your work could have been improved upon.
• Expensive or elaborate bindings and covers for submissions are not required in most instances. (Refer to guidelines however in the case of dissertations).
• The Business School has a policy of anonymous marking of individual assessments which applies to most modules. You should not identify yourself directly in the work you submit and you may need to use phrases such as “the author of this assignment ….”in the detail of your submission.

Avoid academic misconduct
Warning: Collusion, plagiarism and cheating are very serious offences that can result in a student being expelled from the University. The Business School has a policy of actively identifying students who engage in academic misconduct of this nature and routinely applying detection techniques including the use of sophisticated software packages.
• Avoid Collusion. The Business School encourages group working, however to avoid collusion always work on your own when completing individual assessments. Do not let fellow students have access to your work at any stage and do not be tempted to access the work of others. Refer to your module tutor if you do not understand or you need further guidance.
• Avoid Plagiarism. You must use available and relevant literature to demonstrate your knowledge of a subject, however to avoid plagiarism you must take great care to acknowledge it properly.Plagiarism is the act of stealing someone else’s work and passing it off as your own. This includes incorporating either unattributed direct quotation(s) or substantial paraphrasing from the work of another/others. For this reason it is important that you cite all the sources whose work you have drawn on and reference them fully in accordance with the Harvard referencing standard. (This includes citing any work that you may have submitted yourself previously). Extensive direct quotations in assessed work is ill advised because it represents a poor writing style, and it could lead to omission errors and a plagiarism offence could be committed accidentally.
• Avoid the temptation to “commission” work or to cheat in other ways. There are temptations on the internet for you to take “short cuts”. Do not be tempted to either commission work to be completed on your behalf or search for completed past academic work.
• When you submit your work you will be required to sign an important declaration (via the E-Submission Cover Sheet Form) that the submission is your own work, any material you have used has been acknowledged and referenced, you have not allowed another student to have access to your work, the work has not been submitted previously, etc.

Assessment Brief/ Task
The detailed requirements for this task are as follows:
As a global HR specialist, what are the cross-cultural challenges you may face in attempting to use HR best practice as a performance intervention in a multinational context? Critically evaluate this question by drawing fromthe appropriate academic literatures tojustifyrelevance and effectiveness of the HRM/OB tools under consideration.
Consider the followingframe of reference:
• The theoretical and changing HRMlandscape– e.g., the move from Personnel Management, SHRM, RBV,models of HRM and HR Best Practices.
• Significance of HR nest practices and organisational behaviour (OB)tools in assisting managers coping with cross-cultural challenges/dynamicswithin aMNC. Consider one of the following HR best practices e.g., Employee Training/Learning & Development, Recruitment & Selection, and Performance Management.
• Assumptions underpinning the way in which HRbest practices arebeing propagated within a MNC, particularly in different cross-cultural environments.
• The influence of culture vis-a-vis the ‘enactment’ of HR best practices and the attendant OB theoretical tools in the management of individuals and the organisation – tease out the complexities, cultural tensions and mitigation associated with implementation of HR best practicein a MNC.

The following information is important when:
• Preparing for your assessment
• Checking your work before you submit it
• Interpreting feedback on your work after marking.

Assessment Criteria
The module learning outcomes (LO) tested by this assessment task are indicated on page 1. The precise criteria against which your work will be marked are as follows:
• Content: Breath and relevance of academic content/context including peer reviewed journals
• Analysis: Depth of synthesis and critical evaluation
• Application: Evidence of how theoretical tools is shown to apply and relevant to workplace
• Written communication: Grammar, coherence, logic of arguments, and Harvard referencing

For a custom paper on the above topic, place your order now!

• High Quality custom-written paper